home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
TeX 1995 July
/
TeX CD-ROM July 1995 (Disc 1)(Walnut Creek)(1995).ISO
/
tex-k
/
tex-k-archive.past
/
1994.12.gz
/
1994.12
/
000103_walt@snowhite.cis.uoguelph.ca_Tue Dec 27 13:47:20 1994.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Internet Message Format
|
1994-12-30
|
2KB
Received: from snowhite.cis.uoguelph.ca by cs.umb.edu with SMTP id AA23864
(5.65c/IDA-1.4.4 for <tex-k@cs.umb.edu>); Tue, 27 Dec 1994 18:52:56 -0500
Received: from ov.cis.uoguelph.ca by snowhite.cis.uoguelph.ca (5.64/1.35)
id AA05132; Tue, 27 Dec 94 23:51:23 GMT
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 1994 18:47:20 -0500 (EST)
From: <walt@snowhite.cis.uoguelph.ca>
Subject: Re: why does toc appear at end of ps file
To: Robin Fairbairns <Robin.Fairbairns@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Cc: kary berry archive-help <tex-k@cs.umb.edu>
In-Reply-To: <"swan.cl.cam.:258670:941227224311"@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Message-Id: <Pine.3.05.9412271815.A8876-b100000@snowhite.cis.uoguelph.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
On Tue, 27 Dec 1994, Robin Fairbairns wrote:
> > when using dvips to process a dvifile the TeX table of contents
> > usuall appears at the end numbered -1,-2, ... Why? How can I
> > remedy this without clumsily setting the options -p and -l on
> > the command line of dvips?
>
> I presume you're using Gnu TeXinfo? This does indeed stick the toc at
> the end (thus enabling itself to process a document with no cross-
> references in one pass). The negative page numbers cause the number
> to come out in lower-case roman numerals (analagously to the way plain
> TeX's \folio does the job). I guess the GNU people just don't have
> access to printers that force duplex printing...
Yes. I was processing a texinfo file. In this case Karl's kpathsea.dvi.
I had noticed this phenomena with other Gnu stuff and I made some
attempt to edit the source - to no avail! I have the documentation for
texi, it is, of course, a texinfo file!
>
> I don't know of any other packge that prints toc at the end and gives
> it negative page numbers. In my use of TeX, this arrangement is far
> from `usual'.